The Leavenworth Way of War

History Discussion at CGSC

Power of the Mind

What follows is a simple example of how flexable and adaptive the mind can be.  It goes to some of the ideas regarding thinking addressed in C120.  Something to think about in terms of teaching and improving critical and creative thinking.

7H15      M3554G3

            53RV35      7O PR0V3

            H0W      0UR M1ND5 C4N

            D0      4M4Z1NG 7H1NG5!

            1MPR3551V3      7H1NG5!

            1N      7H3 B3G1NN1NG

            17      WA5 H4RD BU7

            N0W,      0N 7H15 LIN3

            Y0UR      M1ND 1S

            R34D1NG      17

            4U70M471C4LLY

            W17H      0U7 3V3N

            7H1NK1NG      4B0U7 17,

            B3      PROUD! 0NLY

            C3R741N      P30PL3 C4N

            R3AD      7H15.

            PL3453      F0RW4RD 1F

            U      C4N R34D 7H15.

             

If u can read this, you have a strange mind, too. Only 55 people out of 100  can.

I cdnuolt  blveiee  that I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd what I  was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of   the hmuan  mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it  dseno’t  mtaetr in what oerdr the ltteres in a word are, the olny iproamtnt  tihng is that the frsit and last ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset  can  be a taotl mses and you can still raed it  whotuit a pboerlm. This is  bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey  lteter by istlef, but the word as  a wlohe.  Azanmig  huh?  Yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt!

             

            If  you can raed  this frowrad it.

Advertisements

August 30, 2013 - Posted by | C120

3 Comments »

  1. The brains ability to read jumbled test is interesting and I have seen something like this before on the internet, so I did a quick Google search on some of the actual science behind the phenomenon. It turns out there are some truths and some fallacies with the ability to read jumbled letters. What seems to matter is not just the order of the letters, but also: word length, the sentence structure, and the context that the reader is able to pick up from the composition. I took a lot the discussion by Matt Davis, a researcher at the Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit in the UK, that talks about some of the problems with the stuff floating around the internet (1). Check out the link below if you are interested.

    Also, I found a website that an assistance professor of law from Duke University wrote to allow you to create you our jumbled text sentences. (2)

    1. Davis, Matt (2012) Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit. Cambridge, UK.
    http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/people/matt.davis/cmabridge/

    2. Sachs, Stephen E. (2011) The Jumbler. Webpage.
    http://www.stevesachs.com/jumbler.cgi

    Comment by Aaron M. Parker | September 4, 2013

  2. Aaron, while slightly less scholarly than your footnotes, there was a recent television series (Your Bleeped Up Brain) on the History Channel and iTunes which uses a similar experiment illustrating the brain’s ability to “correct” text and information that we see and read in order to help us make sense of it. I believe that this is really an indication, or example, that our brains can read the “hidden message” because they use a logical paradigm based on what the “hidden message” looks like at first glance.

    It would appear that because of this paradigm, as the text is in the format of a written message, our brains force the message to be converted to a text message… allowing us to read it when going fairly quickly over the “words.” This is further facilitated by the similarity between the numbers and the letters they have been substituted for. When we slow down and analyze the “words” one at a time, at least to me, it seems much more difficult to decipher because I am no longer allowing my brain to view the garbled characters as real words or a message.

    Comment by LCDR Matt Krull | September 10, 2013

  3. Aaron and Matt — good comments. The point of this demonstration is not the details of the mixed up lettering message. Rather it is the unconsious process the mind goes through, much faster and effective than consious thought, to decipher it. This message is just a demonstration. The implications for the military, training, education, and operations are what is important.

    First, should we train our minds to recognize military significant patterns?

    What patterns do we want our brains to recognize? Are there military occupation specialty specific patterns or are there general pattern recognition that all mitliary officers would benefit from?

    How do you train such pattern recognition?

    Things to think about –and maybe do something about in the future.

    Comment by dimarcola | September 11, 2013


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: